Is there a scenario where a paymentID has more than orderID attached to it?

When getting a single payment, there is an object for [order]. In that object, there is an array of Order IDs. I'd like to know if there is ever a scenario where there is more than one order ID for a single paymentID.

Thanks

10 |2000

Attachments: Up to 2 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 512.0 KiB each and 1.0 MiB total.

David Marginian ♦♦ commented · Mar 17, 2020 at 06:02 PM

Are you using the /v3/merchants/mid/payments/pid endpoint? That returns an order with a single id:

"order": {
  "id": "orderId"
},

0 ·

cloveruser808 David Marginian ♦♦ commented · Mar 17, 2020 at 10:33 PM

Yes, that is what I'm using.

Scratch that! I actually think I understand your pattern better just now. I thought that because the way the order object inside the payment was being shown, that it could be conceivable to have more than one orderID attached to a payment.

But I now realize that you use the [elements] tag to indicate that an array of multiple things can belong to the object in question.

If you had any scenario which more than one orderID could be attached to a payment, I would have seen an elements array. So you helped me visualize my answer. Thank you

0 ·

question